Field research, soil intelligence and practical crop management — reviewed 27 August 2026
Peer review
Thanks to reviewers
We acknowledge the specialists who contributed careful, independent assessments of manuscripts considered for publication. Their work helps authors strengthen research and supports a reliable editorial record.
Editorial recognition Reviewing is a practical contribution to clear, rigorous agronomic communication.
Acknowledgement record
Specialist judgement strengthens the research conversation.
Agronomy records its appreciation for the colleagues listed below, who assisted with the assessment of submitted articles. The archive includes work that proceeded to publication as well as manuscripts that did not advance through the editorial process.
This historical acknowledgement preserves the names and affiliations supplied for the review period while presenting them independently from current editorial roles.
M. Kaleem AbbasiPakistan
Arturo AlvinoItaly
Stefano AmaducciItaly
Gaetano AmatoItaly
Valeria AnconaItaly
Luciana Gabriella AngeliniItaly
Lorenzo BarbantiItaly
Angelo BasileItaly
Luca BechiniItaly
Paolo BenincasaItaly
Massimo BrambillaItaly
Giovanni BrunoItaly
Vincenzo CandidoItaly
Vito CantoreItaly
Gian Luca CarusoItaly
Raffaele CasaItaly
Ana Maria CastagninoArgentina
Mirko CastelliniItaly
Cristiano CasucciItaly
Eugenio CazzatoItaly
Venera CopaniItaly
Barbara De LuciaItaly
Giuseppe De MastroItaly
Pasquale De VitaItaly
Andrea Del GattoItaly
Antonio EliaItaly
Hazem ElshafieEgypt
Christoph EngelsGermany
Massimo FagnanoItaly
Paolo FantiItaly
Rossana FerraraItaly
Zina FlagellaItaly
Antonio FranceschiniItaly
Giuseppe GambacortaItaly
Giuseppe GattaItaly
Fabio GrestaItaly
Manuel Alejandro Guzman HernandezVenezuela
Guido LinguaItaly
Giovanni MauromicaleItaly
Massimo MonteleoneItaly
Francesco MorariItaly
Nicoletta Nassi O Di NassoItaly
Cristina PatanèItaly
Michele PisanteItaly
Salvatore Antonino RaccuiaItaly
Alessia RestucciaItaly
Pier Paolo RoggeroItaly
Gabriella RossiItaly
Pietro RubinoItaly
Paolo RuisiItaly
Dario SaccoItaly
Pietro SantamariaItaly
Manuel ScerraItaly
Mahmoud F. SeleimanFinland
Maria SidariItaly
Anna Maria StellacciItaly
Simona TarriconeItaly
Fabio TittarelliItaly
Mohammad ValipourIran
Concetta VazzanaItaly
How peer review works
A structured editorial route separates initial checks, specialist assessment and publication decisions.
01
Editorial check
The submission is checked for scope, completeness and suitability for assessment.
02
Reviewer selection
Relevant subject knowledge is matched to the manuscript under consideration.
03
Independent assessment
Reviewers examine methods, interpretation, clarity and the support for conclusions.
04
Editorial decision
Reports inform the decision and any requested revision without replacing editorial judgement.
Contributor workspace
Direct routes for authors, reviewers and editorial users.